Does the Indian Muslim today need special benefits from the Government?
The Sachar Panel Report, which is looking into the social and economic conditions of the Indian Muslims, is set to present its report to the Prime Minister this month.
The findings of the Panel have been potentially explosive so far. They suggest that Muslims are worse off than OBCs across the country and in some areas, worse off than Schedules Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
Does the Indian Muslim today need special benefits from the Government?THIS MIGHT BE A QUESTION THAT COMES IN MIND OF COMMON INDIAN CITIZEN WHETHER A MUSLIMOR NON MUSLIM. READ BELOW TO KNOW THE REAL SITUATION
Total Muslim Population in India : 13.4% (Population of India is little over 1 Billion)
94.9% of Muslims in Below Poverty Line (BPL)
Muslims in Jails 35%, out of total number of inmates at state and federal prisons.
Muslims high school passed: 7.2%
Muslims enrolled in colleges: 6.5%
Muslims Graduate in Rural areas is between 0.8% to 1.3%, Muslims Graduate in Urban areas is 6.1%, just 1.2 per cent are post-graduates.
54.6% Muslims in villages and 60 per cent in urban areas, have never attended schools
Government Staff 6.4%, Police Services 3.3%, Administration services 2.2%, Foreign services 1.6% & Total labour force 10%.
Muslims in Judiciary 8% & Judges 2.7%.
60.2% Muslims who lives in rural areas do not have any land.
Just 2.1% of Muslim farmers have tractors. With 15,25,000 tractors, India ranks No.4 after US, Japan and Italy .
A mere 1% own handpumps for safe/clean drinking water...
While only 3.2 per cent of Muslims get subsidized loans, just 1.9 per cent of the community benefit from the Antyodaya Anna Yojana Scheme, a program meant to prevent starvation among the poorest of poor by providing food grains at a subsidized rate.
Some of the important observations made by the Rajinder Sachar committee:
The committee found shocking instances of discrimination against the community. These include cases of Muslims not getting loans from even nationalized banks and finding it difficult to sell or buy property.
"There is an implicit diktat that loans should not be given in specific areas dominated by Muslims because of the high probability of default", the committee observed after its visit to Rajasthan between August 22 and 24 last year.
The committee also found inadequate number of government schools in the Muslim-dominated areas contributing to the low number of Muslim boys and girls attending the schools.
THIS IS THE SITUATION OF MUSLIMS IN INDIA. SIT AND THINK TOGETHER TO IMPROVE THIS WORST SITUATION
1 comment:
Majlis Ittehadul Muslimeen MP Asaduddin Owaisi on Sachar Comittee Report in Parliament
ASADUDDIN OWAISI MP (HYDERABAD) : Thank you for giving me this opportunity. I rise to support the Bill that has been tabled in the august House. I have got some important points to bring to the notice of the august House.
The Sachar Committee report has been tabled in this House. It clearly states the educational backwardness of the Muslim community. According to Sachar Report, there are 39 per cent OBCs and 0.8 per cent Scheduled Caste in the Muslim community.
I support this Bill which provides reservation in Central Universities to SCs, STs and OBCs. However, I would like to know as to how fair it is to deny the benefits of reservation on the basis of religion, especially after the Government has tabled the Sachar Report in this august House which shows how bad my educational standards are and my conditions are.
I would just like to quote one point here as far as the report is concerned. Page 73 of Sachar Report clearly says, “The percentage of population of graduates, as far as the Muslims are concerned, is 1.2 and those attending P.G. courses is 16.3.” It is lesser in Muslims than in dalits also. You are not implementing these minority universities over there. But why is it that I am being denied such benefits? Moreover, the Presidential Order of 1950 contravenes the basic fundamental rights given in the Constitution.
How is it that only SCs belonging or professing the religion of Hinduism or Sikhism or neo Buddhism are being given reservation? Why not Dalit Christians and Dalit Muslims? This question has to be pondered over by the Government. I would request you sincerely, Sir, that the Government should come forward and ensure that the 1950 Presidential Order, Schedule III is amended. It says that only a person professing Hinduism or Sikhism or neo Buddhism can be classified as Schedule Caste. How is that possible? This Report of yours clearly says this. There is this argument about Muslims and OBCs. Why is it such a low percentage is there? This has to be looked into.
Lastly, about Jamia Milia University, how is that the present Vice-Chancellor wants to implement this present Bill in Jamia Milia University? Why has the Vice-Chancellor overnight changed this position? Why are we being denied such benefits? I would request you that this issue has to be taken care of. They have applied to the National Minority Education Commission also. It is pending over there. If Jamia Milia University is not a minority University, then, which is a minority university? This is a very important question. These are important points I wanted to bring to the notice of the august House.
I support this Bill. I hope that this UPA Government will take affirmative action and will not deny us reservation under Article 16(4). If people are opposed to reservations to Muslims, they should look into the pre-native history of Article 16(4). It is none other than Sardar Vallabhai Patel, who has stated `classes’ means `Minorities’. He was the Chairman of that Advisory Committee. Why are Muslims having reservations in Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka? Why can they not be given reservations nationwide? It has to be done. Literacy rate of 13 per cent of population is only 59. There is a huge difference between literate and educated persons. You can very well imagine 13 per cent of population with a literacy of 59 per cent. Hence, I would request that the Government should come forward with the proposal and I hope that the hon. Minister, when he stands up to reply would respond to this or this UPA Government has to amend 1950 Presidential Order. They have to take affirmative action under Articles 15(4) and 16(4).
Thank you.
Post a Comment