Difference between Qadianis and Muslims

I want to tell you briefly how Qadianis differ from
other 'Kafirs'. But before Ido so, I shall answer a
question which is in the minds of some of the Ummah

THE QUESTION (In 3 Parts):
Firstly: Why is it that an organization called Aalami
Majlise Tahaffuze Khatme Nubuwwat has been set up,
specifically aiming to pursue Qadianis to whichever
part of the world they go and expose them by Allah's
help and with the cooperation of Muslim brethren when
there are other non- Muslims also in the world, such
as Jews, Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, etc?

Secondly: Why is there no such organization against
any other 'Kafir' community?

Thirdly: What was the reason for such stalwarts of
Islam as Imam-ul'asr Muhammad Anwar Shah Kashmiri,
Sheikh-ul-Islam Maulana Muhammad Yusuf Binnori,
Ameer-e-Shariat Ataullah Shah Bukhari, and Hazrate
Aqdas Maulana Mufti Mahmood, (Allah's mercy on all of
them), attached so much importance to counter the
'Kufr' of Qadianis that it was considered necessary to
estab- lish an organization, on an international
level, namely Aalami Majlis-e-Tahaffuz- e-Khatme
Nubuwwat?

ANSWER:
Before I answer, I sum up the question which in short
is: What distinguishes a Qadiani from other
Non-Muslims?

First I lay before you an example:

You know that alchol is prohibited in Shari'at.
Drinking alchol, manufacturing and selling it are all
prohibited, i.e., 'Ha ram.' Similarly, you know that a
Pig is filthy and impure. Selling its meat which is
called pork and its eating, giving or conveying are
absolute prohibitions, i.e., 'Harame Mutlaq.' Everyone
is aware of these precepts.

Now imagine a situation: A man sells alchol and calls
it alchol. Another man also sells alchol but pastes a
label of 'Zam-Zam' on the bottle, i.e., he is selling
alchol under the name of 'Zam-Zam'. Both persons are
criminals but who is a greater criminal? You know the
answer.

Take another example: There is a butcher who is
selling pork. He sells it as such. Clearly he says
this is pork. Whosoever wants to buy may buy it.
Certainly he is a criminal in Shariat for selling
pork. Against this is a person who, sells pork but
calls it mutton. Now both those persons have committed
a crime in Islamic Law; but sky-high is the difference
in the nature of the offence between the two. One
sells 'Unlawful,' i.e., 'Haram' calling it 'Unlawful,'
Haram. The other sells 'Unlawful' Haram, calling it
'Lawful', i.e. 'Halal.' Anybody, unawares, could fall
into his trap and eat 'Unlawful-Haram' pork thinking
it to be 'Lawful-Halal' mutton. Thus the difference
between a butcher selling pork as mutton and a butcher
selling pork as pork is precisely the difference
between a Qadiani and other Non-Muslim such as Jew,
Christian and Hindu, etc. 'Kufr' is 'Kufr' in both
cases because it is negation of Islam. But 'Kafirs' of
the world do not put label of Islam on their 'Kufr'
and do not propagate their 'Kufr' as Islam. A Qadiani,
on the other hand, puts a label of Islam on his 'Kufr'
and deceives Muslims by saying this is Islam.

CATEGORIES OF 'KAFIRS'
So far I have spoken to you in general terms. I shall
explain the theology.

'Kufr' is of several kinds but three are very obvious:

First: The 'Kafir' who is undoubtedly a 'Kafir.

Second: That 'Kafir' who is 'Kafir' from inside but
pretends as Muslim from outside.

Third: That 'Kafir',who tries to label his 'Kufr' as
Islam

Category No. 1:
Jews, Christians, Hindus, etc., are unmistakenly and
undoubtely Kaffirs. The Polytheist (mushrikeen) of
pre-Islamic Mecca were openly included in this
category. All of them are openly Kaffirs.

Category No. 2:
In the second category are Hypocrites (munafiqueen)
who recite the Kalimah with the tongue but hide Kufr
in their hearts. In their case Allah, the Exalted, has
proclaimed:

When they (hypocrites) come to thee, they say: "We
believe": but in fact they enter with a mind against
Faith, and they go out with the same but Allah knoweth
fully all that they hide. (HQ 5.61)

Hazrat Imam Shafai, (Allah's mercy on him) used to say
about Ibrahim bin Ulayya: "I am his opponent, so much
so, that I shall oppose him even if he recites the
Kalimah Tayyiba"

It means that some persons are so compulsive liars
that they lie even in 'Kalimah Tayyiba' because their
'Kalimah' is a show of falsehood.

Category No. 3:
The 'Kufr' of the third category exceeds the 'Kufr' of
the second category because their offence is that they
call their 'Kufr' as Islam. They present pure 'Kufr'
in the nomenclature of Islam by twisting the verses of
the holy Quran, the sacred 'Ahadith' of the Prophet
(SAW), the statements of his Companions and sayings of
revered saints in order to prove their 'Kufr' as
Islam. Such men are called zindiq (Dualist-infidels)
in Shari'at terminology.

To sum up, the three categories are Unbelievers;
Kafir); Hypocrites: (Munafiq); and Dualist- lnfidel:
(Zindiq).

'Kafir' (Unbeliever) is a person who does not believe
in Allah and the Prophet neither outwardly nor
inwardly. 'Munafiq' (Hypo crit) is a person who hides
'Kufr' in his heart and his recitation of 'Kalimah' is
false. He is a pretender. 'Zindiq' (Dualist-Infidel)
is a person who gilt-edges, his 'Kufr' with the gold
of Islam and tries to present it as real Islam.

WHO IS AN APOSTATE
An apostate (Murtad) is a person who abandons Islam. A
precept should be understood here which is recorded in
the books. All the four schools of 'Fiqah' unanimously
agree that in case of an apostate (Murtad), Shari'at
allows him three days to enable him to remove his
doubts. All possible efforts should be made to clarify
his doubts. If he understands and re-enters Islamic
fold, well and good; otherwise he shouk~ be got rid
off. This precept is known as 'killing of apostate'
(Qatl-e-Murtad) . None of the Imams differs on this
issue. Laws of all civilised countries and governments
award death punishment to rebels. As apostate is a
rebel of Islam, therefore apostasy (Irtidad) is
punishable with death.

CONCESSION OF SHARI'AT FOR APOSTATE
Islamic Shari'at offers a concession to its rebels
while laws of the world do not do so. They must put
their traitors to death even if they beg for mercy
after their arrest and award of sentance.

Take the example of a rebel of any modern government.
He may repent, beg to be excused or vouch for good
behaviour a hundred times, assuring the government
that in future he will never resort to revolt; still
he will not be heard. The capital sentence will be
executed on him. His repentance will be unacceptable.
At no cost will he be excused.

But Islamic Shari'at Law gives a concession to its
rebel. The Apostate (Murtad) is allowed three days to
think over. He is advised to withdraw and renounce his
apostatic stance. If he assures for future and is
repentant, he is not punished. In spite of this humane
concession afforded by Shari'at, Non-Muslims criticise
the Islamic punishment. It is a matter of surprise
that there are no objections to the hanging of a
person when caught in conspiracy, say for toppling the
lawful Govern- ments of the American President or the
Russian President or the Pakistani President.
Conspirators are sentenced to death and no law of any
civlised court disagrees with this.

Why do then people disapprove of punishing a person
who rebels against Allah's Prophets and say: Do not
put him to death! Islam does concede three days' grace
to enable the apostate to remove his doubts and come
back into the Islamic fold. If he begs for mercy or
repents, Shari'at grants him his life back. But if he
is adamant and refuses to renounce his apostasy then
Allah's sacred soil must be cleaned of his foul
existence.

APOSTASY IS A DEADLY DISEASE OF MILLAT: WHY?
It is so because it takes the form of a carbuncle
which stinks. If a malignant growth (Allah forbid)
appears on some part of human body, doctors advise its
amputation. Who would call this a tyranny over the
patient? Rather a favour to him! By this removal the
sound parts of the body are saved from septic
poisoning, else death would be certain. Therefore it
is wise to cut away the diseased part to protect the
healthy part.

In the same way apostasy is a carbuncle of Islamic
Mill at. The malignant part, i.e., the 'Murtad,'
despite preaching does not retrace his steps.
Therefore, cancerous malignancy must necessarily be
removed otherwise his poison will gradually travel
inside the entire physiology of the Islamic Millat.
This indeed is the unanimous verdict of the four
Imams, and theologians and doctors of Shari'at law.
Wisdom and sagacity demands it. The safety of Millat
lies in it.

ORDER OF SHARIAT FOR DUALIST - INFIDEL: ZINDIQ
A dualist-infidel is worse than an apostate, because
he is bent upon presenting his 'Kufr' as Islam. Imam
Shafai and Imam Ahmad, in their well-known sayings,
were pleased to ordain that a dualist-infidel (Zindiq)
is governed by the same orders as an apostate
(Murtad); that is, afford him a chance first, give him
time to repent and permit him to return to the Islamic
fold. If within three days he does so, leave him
unscathed, otherwise it is obligatory to award him
capital sentence.

VIEWS OF IMAM MALIK:
Imam Malik, (Allah's blessing on him), goes one step
forward to say:

"I will not accept the penitence of a Dualist-
Infidel".

By this he means to say that if a person guises his
'Kufr' with Islam and does not repent, when caught in
the act, then, (leaving it to Allah whether or not He
accepts his penitence), we shall certainly promulgate
Allah's Shari'at on him, i.e., shall pronounce capital
punishment for him. This is a crime which is similar
to adultery in which a person may be penitent (Taaib)
for future but his penitence will not save him from
death. Therefore, he will be punished under all
circumstances. Similarly, hands are to be amputated
for stealing. A thief, on arrest, may offer penitence
('Tauba') but his offence will not go unpunished. It
is in this light that Imam Malik says:

"I will not accept the penitence of a Dualist
Infidel." Capital punishment will certainly be given
to him, although he may be penitent ('Taaib') a
hundred times.

Similar sayings are on record from Imam Abu Hanifa and
Imam Ahmad bin Hambal, (Allah's blessing on them.) In
books of 'Fiqah' such as 'Durr-e-Mukhtar' and 'Shami'
and some others, it is written that if a
Dualist-Infidel offers penitence ('Tauba') of his own
free will, his penitence will be accepted without
capital penalty, provided no one came to know of his
offence. Similarly, he will be excused from punishment
if he became penitent of his own free will, on Allah's
guidance. Therefore, if a Qadiani renounces his
'Qadianism' on his own and offers penitence ('Tauba')
then he will be excused. On the contrary, if he offers
penitence ('Tauba') after arrest then there will be no
excuse, irrespective of his repentance even a hundred
times.

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN APOSTATE AND DUALIST - INFIDEL:
Shari'at enjoins upon us to preach to the apostate. If
he as a result of preaching, undertakes penitence
('Tauba'), he will save himself from capital
punishment but this does not apply to a
dualist-infidel. There is another saying from Imam
Malik and Imam Abu Hanifa, and one from Imam Ahmad,
(Allah's blessings on them all), that penitence
('Tauba') of a dualist-infidel is not acceptable
because he has committed the crime of dualist
infidelity (Zindaqa), i.e., he applied false coating
of Islam over his 'Kufr'

I repeat, he has sold pork as mutton and wine as
'Zam-Zam.' This is a crime which is not excusable and